Runboard.com
You're welcome.
Community logo

TEOMCROTE = TEOTWAWKI on steroids! The End Of Mankind's Current Reign Over The Earth takes into account that our ancestors were neither suicidal, stupid, nor our genetic inferiors but still wound up getting wiped off the Earth. Whereas CSER [cser.org: Centre for Study of Existential Risk] tries to PREVENT this dispensation from coming to an end, TEOMCROTE works from the eventuality/possibility/probability that the end our age takes place and what to do then

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Hollow Earth


Kevin and Matthew Taylor wrote their Land of No Horizon, which in my view is at the very top of the MUST READ list.
There's a YouTube post with their interview with Coast to Coast AM radio that is not only a good introduction but actually added some insight for me that i hadn't picked up reading their book.

This is a very interesting webpage on the various Hollow Earth sources out there. From what i've researched, it looks quite complete.

Kevin and Matthew Taylor's website also offers links to articles of their's and one can order their book there.
I haven't been able to locate an ebook. I have it hardcopy.

Also see: Humans, Hollow Earth, Health... and Magnesium
and Hollow Earth Hypothesis Key to Many Cosmic 'Mysteries' [see below]


Genesis 1-6:
Then God said, "Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters." God made the expanse, and separated the waters which were below the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse; and it was so.…

Last edited by TheLivingShadow, 4/4/2014, 10:34 am


---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
4/17/2011, 6:47 am Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
the basic story...


I haven't been able to find an ebook torrent for Land of no Horizon, unfortunately. Though i believe it's one of the very few books truly worth buying, reading, and keeping,, many will either not have the funds/ability or they're understandably sceptical. Listening to interviews with father and son Taylor is not only a good place to start, i've learned things from them that i didn't find in their book.
For those who haven't read the book, listened to the Taylors, or just would like a shorter explanation, here it comes...

A molecule is basically like a tiny planet, attracting other matter to it from all directions. This is what we've all heard about gravity all of our lives and what's important here: that's all we've heard, i.e. making up details in order to make the solid earth hypothesis work would go beyond what even scientists dare state.

So if we have 8 molecules in a row, at each end of the row, we'd feel the gravity/pull of 8 molecules. But what if one were in the center? 4 molecules would be pulling in one direction while the 4 others would be pulling in the opposite direction, creating a vacuum.
This explains why gravity gets less when one goes deep down into a mine, a scientific fact that's undisputed.
What force, anyway, would be drawing matter to the center of the Earth? Yes, the further you go down the more matter is 'falling down' on top of you, but there's also LESS matter below you to attract the matter above you in the first place, and MORE matter above you that would be exerting it's own gravitational force UPWARDS.

From this we understand that at the center of any body of matter lies a vacuum. It's common sense that anyone can understand. It takes neither extreme intelligence nor imagination; what it does take is the ability to forget for a moment the axioms and dogmas concocted by best-guess scientists clutching at straws.

The Taylors explain in their book that any celestial body with a mass exceeding 150km will create an inner cavity because of these gravitational/vacuum forces. That's why small moons like the ones around Mars have very erratic shapes whereas all other celestial bodies are almost perfectly spherical, as if one were blowing up a balloon...

Within the crust of our planet, some 600-800km thick, there's a region that again consists of a vacuum; since the crust is much more than 150km in mass, this vacuum is also likely in the form of cavities. Sources suggest that it's not in the middle of the crust due to other mass on the planet working on it, but off-center, perhaps as much as 15% from the inner surface. This also puts another slant on the idea of traveling through the planet crust, for if the crust is at many parts much less dense than at the outside surface, inner earth cultures would've had a very different attitude towards digging 'down'...
Father and son Taylor also suggest that mass striking the Earth in it's later stages of development would've caused the later/outside layers to become much denser than the original mass, leaving us outsiders with the idea that digging down is very hard work, mistakenly extrapolating that to include the rest of the planetary crust.

As the planet grew in size, centrifugal forces balanced with gravitational ones to create the spherical shape we concider so natural for celestial objects (for no good reason...). When the mass surrounding our Sun in the vicinity of the Earth was all collected within the planet, it continued to shift, the elements settling according to gravitational/centrifugal forces working in on them; liquids and gasses slowly worked their way to both surfaces [conceivably to the surfaces of the vacuums within the crust themselves as well!].
On the outside, however, things developed differently than on the inside for obvious reasons; no atmosphere or liquids were lost to space on the inside and there's no endless void for gasses to go up into there. 2 great forces worked to create immense pressure inside: the buildup of gasses and liquids but also: the mass of the Earth is always exuding infrared energy; on the outside it goes out into space and is lost; on the inside it has nowhere to go and helped create a furnace effect, heating the gasses and liquids [i.e. no water but only very hot water vapor].

After billions of years of infrared energy collecting on the inside of the planet, a kind of plasma ball developed in the very center where there's only vacuum. The Taylors suggest that this is no different from any other sun, though on a much smaller scale.
The Hollow Earth sun doesn't shine as brightly nor exude as much heat, but it's enough light for flora and fauna to work with and the heat within the oven-like conditions of the inner earth doesn't dissapate at night like it does into space on the surface.

200.000.000 years ago the pressure had built up to the point every balloon reaches after enough pressure: it balloons.
Imagine blowing up a balloon yourself: you exert force but the balloon only very slightly expands, until you reach a point [that small children don't because they can't exert enough force; they can't blow up balloons] that the balloon gives way and expands.
2 hundred million years ago the Earth started expanding because of the pressures that had built up within the Earth's hollow. One MIGHT refer to the original surface mass as Pangea but the Pangea theory has to do with a fantasy of an Earth that has an eternally same size with continents roaming around on top of it for no good reason; i'm not being facetious: mainstream scientists admit they don't understand how their own theory might work, it's just their best guess.
Their theory also doesn't explain how all of the Earth's continents fit almost perfecting into one another, supposedly after having roamed the surface for billions of years, bumping into one another repeatedly. Occam's Razor applies: they fit into one another because they once did...

The original outside crust is much thicker than the ocean floors, therefore, which is also why most volcanic activity takes place under water. This, btw, is an important factor to understand what kind of destructive forces will likely take place in any EOTWAWKI scenario, i.e. people like Ivan Stein and Patrick Geryl who assume that surface volcanoes will react in any way similar to cracks, vents, and volcanoes on the ocean floors,, aren't taking into account that continental mass is very different from the very new ocean floor mass that's somewhere between 1 and 180 million years old (whereas continental mass is much thicker and upwards of 2 BILLION years old). And in the '90s they discovered that the ocean floors are covered in volcanoes, an estimated 3.000.000; researchers can only guess how many thousand thereof are active.

As the planet expanded, the pressure within the planet became amenable to life similar to that on the outside; flora and fauna similar to elsewhere in the galaxy [see David W i l c o c k's works] developed, though based on life as it is on the inside, i.e. within a kind of oven, with a source of light that remains in the same location in the sky forever, softer light, less gravity, etc.
Under the new expanded conditions the dinosaurs on the surface became too heavy and mammals won out, i.e. according to the Taylors there was never some asteroid hit but the dinosaurs died out in the course of millions of years in accordance with the newly developing conditions, something they say is substantiated by the fossile record.

When the inner earth began to become more hospitable, it developed into a paradise compared to the surface, since it wasn't subject to cosmological destruction [which independent research by people like Paul LaViolette suggests is frequent, occuring at least every 13,000 years], but it also didn't have cold nights and winters that force life to keep stopping and having to start up again all the time. Intelligent species, therefore, developed sooner on the inside and at some point came up to the surface. The surface, however, is inhospitable compared to the nether realm; it has cold dark nights, much of the planet is in winter, the Sun is harsh, the gravity heavy, the animals that are used to the harsh conditions are strong with tough hides, are fast, see at night, etc. etc. etc.

Inner earth peoples tried to develop a hybrid species, a link between themselves and surface primates; see other articles on the forum on Hollow Earth.
We are partly the result of inner earth genes, not being able to cope with harsh light, dark, or cold like other large mammals. We're relatively weak and slow and our babies are virtually cripples for the first years of their life, unable to move about independently for a long time, unlike any other large mammal. Our genes partly stem from the inner earth with it's gentle conditions: gentle gravity, gentle light, friendly constant temperatures.
Either there's a "god" who created us, there's Hollow Earth, or there's both...

The pressure of atmosphere and waters between Hollow Earth and the surface have now been balanced out [since Noah's Flood; see other posts]. The Earth should no longer be growing, though there might be some shifting taking place as it continues to adjust to the (cosmologically speaking) recently changed conditions.

The above suggests also that other planets are not only also hollow but inhabited. Indeed, our entire solar system is full of intelligent life, according to many sources. We will find out at the next EOTWAWKI event why they don't bother talking to us, primitives in their eyes that will soon be washed away by another wave of mega tsunamis we're too stupid to prepare against so our culture can continue... They enjoy their peace and civlization, perhaps entertained by our struggles and drama. emoticon

see Flat Earth addendum

Last edited by TheLivingShadow, 4/17/2015, 11:42 am


---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
5/19/2011, 9:43 am Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Hollow Earth Hypothesis Key to Many Cosmic 'Mysteries'


The arguments for the Hollow Earth hypothesis are powerful for those who've looked into the matter. Though at first glance it seems fantastic and Jules Verne'esk, there are those who've been to the Hollow Earth and offer convincing testimony. In the end the matter is resolved for most people because 'the authorities' obviously don't support the notion so that's the end of it. More and more people, however, are reaching the conclusion that government isn't only not to be trusted but is to be actively mistrusted and if the govt says there is no Hollow Earth, that's more of a reason to believe there is one than to believe them. If there were no Hollow Earth we might actually expect the powers-that-be to be supporting the idea...
According to some sources the CIA are guarding the north pole entrance to this Hollow Earth and also keep an eye on the south pole entrance, both hard to reach at the best of times. However, there are stories that precede the very existence of the CIA that tell of amazing adventures to the center of the Earth and the civilizations and life abundant there. More importantly, if planets [not only our own] are commonly hollow, it would explain a lot of the so-called [artificial] cosmic mysteries out there. A look at a few things the existence of hollow planets would explain.
  
For many years many sources have been talking about polar shifts. There is actually much geological proof that the north and south poles used to be situated so many degrees away from where they are now. When you stop to think about it if there are no north or south pole entrances to a hollow earth, why wouldn't the poles shift all over the planet? Yet, like a spinning top, the Earth may wobble a bit around the poles but always remain in the same general area. Why is the Earth axis centered around a north and south region within a 20 degree range? If the Earth is really just one great ball of nickle and iron with some water and air on top, it might flipflop in any direction and the north pole might sometimes be over the Sahara, over California the next time something causes the Earth to turn, China the next turn, why not? But geological evidence shows the north pole to have been somewhere south of where it is now, over Canada and such, over Siberia another time, but always 'on top'. What determines 'the top of the Earth' [though top and bottom do appear to have flipflopped at some point]? The north and south poles, however, are important physical forces that keep the Earth spinning somewhere around them. Centrifugal force cannot abide by the main mass being on the top of a spinning top's spin. Imagine the toy spinning top you may have played with as a kid; it'll wobble a bit, fall down if the spinning is too slow, and if it's in mid air may flop upside-down, but natural forces will not allow it to turn on its side and stay there. The Earth is the same way. There is a definite top and bottom to the Earth and they exist of the north and south poles, physical parts of the planet that determine a top and bottom even though the Earth tends to shift within those limits at times.



Zecharia Sitchin has done extensive research and publishing of the Anunnaki, aliens that visited our planet hundreds of thousands of years ago and genetically engineered mankind into existence. The evidence is in the archaeological proof of tens of thousands of clay tablets 6000 years old. There is no doubt about the veracity of an alien presence, aliens who come from a planet that regularly passes through our solar system. The problem lies in the fact that these aliens, who sculpted us in more or less their image, live on a planet that goes out 60 to 70 AU from the Sun, i.e. 60 to 70 times as far from the Sun as our Earth is, a region in space where even our Sun appears as little more than a bright star in the sky. How can intelligent life develop ON such a planet? No sunlight warms the outside like on Earth. When this planet, Nibiru, is near the Sun on it's elongated orbit, it may experience for a few short years the kind of light we do, but most of its some 2160-year-orbit will be out in the cold reaches of space. Yet we have proof that aliens live on such a planet and moved from there to Earth. Since they were able to live on Earth and since they engineered a new life form, humans, from their DNA and that of primates living on Earth, they must in many ways have developed in an environment akin to that of Earth. Now that's the stickler: was it akin to life ON Earth or life INSIDE Earth...?
  
Life on such a planet would only be possible on the inside thereof. According to some sources the planet the Anunnaki live on circles a brown dwarf and it's this unignited binary twin of our Sun that is Nibiru, crossing through our solar system every so many thousand years, but even if there is an energy source like a brown dwarf that might encourage some kind of life, it would certainly not be life that could just hop over to Earth and look in any way like us, to boot. Red or brown dwarfs emit infra red radiation; energy for sure and quite possibly something that might support life, but certainly completely unlike life on our sunlight-blessed world. However, according to the Hollow Earth hypothesis and accounts thereof, the inner Earth also has its own sun of sorts, creating a soft source of light, not as bright as the Sun of the outside world but similar enough to support abundant and vibrant life. Beings that would develop in such an environment might find the outside of our planet very bright, but still pretty similar to where they're from. Ideally they would prefer the inside of our planet, which is one of the sources for all the stories of Hades and other supposed nether realms. Accounts about the Anunnaki, the aliens who came down to Earth, include their problems with the brightness of our Sun's light, including the stories of the so-called Grays, aliens who live within the confines of grey organic spacesuits, beings well-known for extreme protection of their eyes.
Sitchin's translations, unfortunately, don't take the existence of Hollow Earth into account. That's unfortunate because it would explain many of the forced translations he ended up with. For one, there is constant talk of dividing the Earth between the lower and upper part and ancient mines in South Africa are embraced as proof that with a lower and upper part of Earth were meant the northern and southern hemispheres. That's especially unfortunate because there are stories of having to pass through some kind of portal to reach this lower Earth and this is explained away as some kind of building or other when the logical translation would have to do with the north or south pole, an opening of just a few hundred kilometers and therefore conceivably guardable by alien technology. It's no great leap of logic to assume a technologically evolved species could use the poles as doorways that can be shut or opened at will by applying defensive weaponry. There are stories of ambassadors 'going down' through some portal to a nether realm; that's no way to describe a trip to Africa, that's for sure.

continue to part 2

---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
2/17/2012, 6:50 pm Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Hollow Earth Hypothesis Key to Many Cosmic 'Mysteries' [part 2 of 2]


In his classic When Worlds Collide Velikovsky makes a strong argument that the planet Venus started out some 4500 years ago as some kind of offshoot of the planet Jupiter, starting its own existence as a comet until it finally settled in its modern orbit between Earth and Mercury. Supposedly Venus somehow broke free of Jupiter and threatened Earth civilizations for many centuries, giving rise to many ancient stories and myths, the Israeli Exodus, to name one. Velikovsky, too, doesn't take the Hollow Earth hypothesis into consideration though Neal Adams' Growing Earth hypothesis, an idea that goes hand in hand with the idea of hollow planets, goes a long way in explaining where the hell this Venus came from. According to Greek myth, Pallas Athene was born fully grown from the head of Zeus/Jupiter. This needs to be translated to: the comet/planet Venus came from the north pole entrance/exit of the planet Jupiter. The Growing Earth hypothesis not only suggests that planets grow as matter is constantly being added to existing matter but also that matter can form in chunks on the inside of said planets. A planet the size of Jupiter, therefore, could conceivably have produced a Venus-sized sphere that somehow escaped through the north pole entrance to start a separate existence, perhaps initially as satelite of Jupiter. Considering the coming of the Venus comet was not long after one of Nibiru's passes through our solar system, it's also conceivable that such a satelite was pulled free of Jupiter's orbit to become free of its gravity and end up coming in our direction.
  
The Hollow Earth hypothesis, therefore, also serves as a possible origin of the planet Venus according to ancient myths all over the world, as summed up and brought together by Velikovsky in his scientific-community-shattering book. Sitchin has proved by his work that the Sumerian clay tablets show considerable knowledge about the cosmos, knowledge assumed by most so-called scholars to be something of only recent civilization. And this knowledge was passed on to cultures, like the Greeks, who turned this into myths they themselves may or may not have understood but were based on astronomical facts, even unknown to NASA. A civilization that goes back hundreds of thousands of years, that of the Anunnaki, would have things to tell us that we should listen to, but similarly human civilizations of thousands of years ago consisted of intelligent and often well-informed astronomers and other kinds of scholars. Their messages passed down through the ages have things to tell us that we'd do well to take seriously even if they only reach us in the form of myths. This is what Velikovsky has done.

So where else would the Anunnaki come from if not from the hollow part of their own planet? How else do we explain the north and south pole regions of our own planet? Where else would Venus come from according to the myths that more and more appear to be based on astronomical fact instead of fancyful stories?
Less known evidence is also available. It appears so-called extinct animal carcasses wind up on the shores of Siberia like mammoths. Coming free after being frozen in ice thousands of years ago or are they mammoths that to this very day live in the Hollow Earth, wandering on to the ice connecting the north pole to the inside to die there and wash away to end up on Siberian shores? There are a lot of bones washing up there...

The very existence of a Hollow Earth might go a long way in explaining why there's a human presense on the surface of the planet at all, considering alien life forms interested in our planet. Why would they allow us to live if not for the simple reason that they don't care about the surface because life in the inside is much better? Especially the inner-planet Anunnaki would prefer the inner Earth, if for no other reason than that their own planet (or brown dwarf) Nibiru comes by every 4300 years [2 x 2160 years; its orbit only bringing it close to Earth every other passing] to destroy most of what's on the surface. Extensive superior life on the inside also helps explain the UFO phenomenon; supposedly, life on the inside is not as tempestuous and civilizations have thrived there in peace for thousands of years, giving rise to technological development we can only dream of.
  
Great scientific thinkers like Arthur C. Clarke have surmised that interstellar space travel is a fanciful idea without any true merrit and that gives way to the thought that UFOs aren't EXTRAterrestial at all, but rather inner-terrestial. The limits placed on physical space travel could be very limited, Einstein's E=mc2 in mind, so if our Earth is an alien destination at all, it's unlikely any aliens making the journey arrive here in physical form. The physical UFO's, therefore, are then just part of inner-Earth civilizations who look to the outer world as an inferior playground of sorts.
Also, if there are truly repetitive massive destructions on the surface, the inner Earth could well be the source of continued life and reseeding thereof on the surface. This is a great comfort as far as the mass extinctions being perpetrated today, for instance the slaughter of whale populations that have been going on for the last 150 years, for if the surface seas have become inhospitable, it's very likely life goes on in all its glory for such creatures in the inner ocean, even though it's not as large as the outside oceans.

  
Knowledge about Hollow Earth is systematically being kept from us. An expedition planned to go to Hollow Earth in a Russian atomic ice-breaker was broken off at the last moment when the expedition leader suddenly died one week before casting off... Supposedly, satelite photos that reveal the north and south pole entrances are edited before reaching the public. Ever wonder why all space exploration is the monopoly of the government's NASA? Why? Why does the government, from the very beginning of NASA, demand complete and utter control over knowledge about space and our planet from space? Profit? Hardly. There are things we're not meant to know and Hollow Earth is one of them. But once you take the existence of Hollow Earth into account many of the pieces of the puzzles surrounding certain mysteries fall into place. It's well worth looking into, if for no other reason than knowing we are not alone. But don't look up, look down...

---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
2/17/2012, 6:52 pm Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheDoctorIsInTheHouse Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
the hollow Sun


ERIC DOLLARD, Sun expert researcher
9 min. YouTube vid
2/16/2013, 7:10 pm Link to this post Send Email to TheDoctorIsInTheHouse   Send PM to TheDoctorIsInTheHouse Blog
 


Add a reply





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top