finding [& keeping] a (suitable) mate https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/t548 Runboard| finding [& keeping] a (suitable) mate en-us Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:57:53 +0000 Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:57:53 +0000 https://www.runboard.com/ rssfeeds_managingeditor@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds managing editor) rssfeeds_webmaster@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds webmaster) akBBS 60 ideas / articles / vidshttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p3748,from=rss#post3748https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p3748,from=rss#post3748Women know in 3 minutes if you can be a life mate. Which is ironic since She wants you to make the move The Art of Receiving Pleasure “There is a secret about human love that is commonly overlooked: Receiving it is much more scary and threatening than giving it. How many times in your life have you been unable to let in someone’s love or even pushed it away? Much as we proclaim the wish to be truly loved, we are often afraid of that, and so find it difficult to open to love or let it all the way in.” ~ John Welwood Durianrider's Best Relationship Tips For Men In 5 Minutes. 5 min vid The sex-starved marriage: Michele Weiner-Davis at TEDxCU What Women REALLY Want sources: - Tripp Advice - Richard LaRuinanondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Fri, 27 Dec 2019 21:14:02 +0000 genitalshttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p3520,from=rss#post3520https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p3520,from=rss#post3520How to make your Vagina Smell & Taste Deliciousnondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:18:13 +0000 monogamy vs polygamyhttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p3072,from=rss#post3072https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p3072,from=rss#post3072Scishow channel on monogamy The above vid puts Charles Darwin's work, the Descent of Man, into modern perspective. Mankind is typical of polygamous species and monogamy should, by all accounts, be considered unnatural. 87% of all cultures on the planet know polygamy, though generally about 10% of individuals within polygamous societies actually practice it. Both of these numbers are extremely significant; 87% means "almost 90%" of all peoples accept polygamy; 10% implies that if the United States were to practice polygamy, that more than 30,000,000 Americans would be in a polygamous relationship. That stands in stark contrast to the outright laws against polygamy in the United States, EVEN among peoples [such as the 'Mormons'] who suggest polygamy is natural and even desirable.nondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Sat, 03 Aug 2013 12:49:01 +0000 getting sexhttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2993,from=rss#post2993https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2993,from=rss#post2993Women, Literally, Go Wild On Vacation Stealth Attraction Secret Society and culture conspire against people having sex and/or being happy. Getting good sex and enough of it are a natural part of humanity and happiness but social mores [i.e. culture] and laws [i.e. politically established confines] commonly produce frustration and unhappiness. The cutting edge research into health is establishing that health is linked to hormones, especially the sexual hormones. Beyond this, happiness is attained by desired results. Obviously, both are systematically undermined by culture and law. This structural undermining of happiness and humanity is compounded by the fact that women, by nature, tend to adjust to their social surroundings. Genetically, women are not trail blazers. They are peace makers and part of that inherently means that they avoid (constant) confrontation with others; that means that if most everyone is doing certain things or things in a certain way, they will naturally be inclined to comply. This is so unfortunate in the case of sexuality because the POWER in sex lies with the female; because women naturally hold the power in sexual matters, this power determines sexual activity; because the woman (generally) complies with cultural/social norms, her power actually helps establish the very norms thrust upon her (even though men do not care so much about society, politics, or culture when it comes to sex). Her attitudes toward law and society serve to implement and support whatever is the ruling sentiment of the day (rather than transcend or defy such). Women are naturally [humanly, i.e. in line with humanity's genetic blueprint] (sexually) submissive so it's logical that they do not confront society or law. ESPECIALLY in matters relating to sexuality they will tend to be compliant to the other. The sexual power is at odds with this attitude in the rest of a woman's life. The feminine submissiveness FOLLOWS the female's sexual initiative and HER choice of mate. NATURALLY it is the female that determines when and if mating will take place. CULTURALLY, however, it is determined that women are to be pursued. Culturally, therefore, the party which should (naturally) be initiating sexuality takes on a waiting attitude. (And as already remarked, women NATURALLY tend to abide by social and cultural mores.) All of this is actually compounded by the fact that women are also given sexual power by law. This APPEARS contradictive: if women are not only naturally but also judicially so sexually powerful, how is it that by law and social mores they are submissive? It is because of the inconsistent and contradictive nature of (politically contrived) law: - there are all kinds of laws that limit sexual freedom, inherently condemning (many aspects of) it and creating an anti-sexual culture - women (therefore by nature) comply with the anti-sexual culture and leave it up to men to initiate sexual activity - at the same time, however, all kinds of sexual activity and initiatives are either downright illegal or can easily be construed as such should a women so decide. Men are extremely wary of the dangers of sexual activity; because of the laws stacked in favor of women, any woman can effectively blackmail any man. If a woman yells "Rape", men can easily experience severe social, judicial, and/or financial penalties. Law, therefore, helps create a culture that demands that men (quite unnaturally) become the initiator in sexual matters (due to the natural tendencies of women to comply with law and culture), while simultaneously CURTAILING men's ability to pick up the slack. Men experience a sexual hormonal peak every 20 minutes and their inherent nature as well as their sexual nature make that they couldn't care less about what culture or laws say about sexual matters. However, to be thrown in jail or have one's life destroyed over a single sexual encounter IS a serious deterrent. Law and culture clearly conspire against sex and are very successful in their attempts to curtail humanity. A very tiny percentage get enough. The only answer is for WOMEN to take charge of sexual matters, as nature intended. Obviously it is only in their own lives that they can successfully manage change. Nature ALSO intended that women comply with the culture at large but any person can consciously transcend their subconscious tendencies once they recognize the issue at hand. Women naturally are the initiators in sexual matters. They must also, however, take the legal confines that men experience into account. Any 15-year-old woman, for example, may have sex with any man she desires, NATURALLY speaking, but cultural and especially JUDICIAL laws give a minor almost the power of life-and-death over the adult male she is sexually active with; such a liason, therefore, can only take place if THE FEMALE takes the insane and inhuman aspects of the relationship into account and allows for, or actually creates, opportunities that DO NOT threaten her sexual mate's freedom. If women are conscious of the processes taking place, they can experience sexuality as is commonly considered impossible in modern-day culture. This would profit both men and women, both being the victim of the inhuman laws and culture we all forced to abide by. It's good to understand that the inhuman forces are at odds with the inherently human forces that rule over sexuality; some kind of compromise between inhuman and human WILL NOT give the desired results. In practice this boils down to certain very practical matters. Women are in charge, sexually speaking; if a woman singles out a male for sex, she checks to see that he's interested and available; what follows need not (and SHOULD not, naturally speaking) convey the demure attitude that social mores and law suggest are appropriate. One of the things women in this culture don't seem to grasp is the sexual message their vaginas convey; to a man, a women wearing panties is conveying a very strong message: "Not yet". The culture wars with nature here: culture suggests that a woman flashing her genitals is indecent and a slut; nature suggests that she's simply saying what she intends: "I wish to mate with you (now)". Women in this inhuman culture actually commonly craw into bed wearing panties even though they wish to have sex. Though panties will not deter a man from intiating sexual acts in many instances, if a woman DOES NOT wish to leave sexual initiative in the man's hand, naturally speaking she would do better by being clear (to herself and her intended sexual mate). Again, laws in modern society are so severe against men who even think about sexual activity that's not CLEARLY mutual that a culture has been established that limits a man's freedom in the sexual arena; the existence of these laws demands that women are overly clear about their intentions. It's not, and never will be, fair; damned if you do, damned if you don't: if you show your vagina SOCIETY condemns you for a slut, if you DON'T, the law condemns you both to live without sex. It becomes a game: Culture? Nature? Culture? Nature? Culture? Nature? Does the man initiate [culture] or the woman [nature]? Dinner? Seduction? Intercourse? All aspects of sex and relationship are up for grabs. It's distasteful. There IS no healthy compromise between humanity and inhumanity, between nature and culture. Naturally speaking, the women rules until she gives up her power in sexual submissiveness. CULTURALLY, though, BOTH are submissive. It then becomes a war or game who will initiate; for the man it's often risky or illegal, for the women it's deemed inappropriate. Both are screwed... Projection works counter-intuitively in these matters, as well; men and women function sexually quite differently. As i already remarked, men have a sexual hormonal peak every 20 minutes; women have one every month. It does not, therefore, work if women project their own attitudes and desire onto men. Women have a very logical tendency to associate sexuality with moods and cycles. Men, on the other hand, have both a physical and mental sexual aptitude that's extremely different. It's good to remark here that there are species on the planet of which male and female are very similar and those of which male and female are very different from one another; humankind belongs to the latter. Modern CULTURE would have us all believe that we are a homogenous bunch. Politics, society, and culture all seem in agreement that we'd all be better off considering man and woman as equals; not with equal RIGHTS, but as actual equals. Politics, society, and culture are by all intents insane, contradictive, and inhuman. One can only transcend the madness, inhumanity, and unhappiness that stems from social, political, and cultural madness by being informed about mankind's ACTUAL nature. Projection itself is quite human; Jesus said "Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you" and it's good advice. It just doesn't work in the sexual arena. The inhuman authoritarian culture, as well, is controlling and a culture exists of men and women controlling each other, including about sexual matters. Men have sex as men do, women have sex as they do; they will never truly understand one another. They SERVICE one another! In sexual matters the Golden Rule does not apply: your own needs go first. This is especially where men are hounded by law: if men do as they would, they'd all be in jail; not because they did not serve the women they had sex with but because all kinds of typically male traits are deemed illegal. If you do not take the inhuman aspects of society and law into account in sexual matters, you are condemned to the asexual life that the culture implicitely construes as desirable (to the detriment of your own humanity).nondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:29:23 +0000 orgasmhttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2968,from=rss#post2968https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2968,from=rss#post2968advertisement on female squirting source Squirting Orgasms video [torrent] - a woman must have self-esteem/a sense of humor - releasing trapped sexual tension is great way to heal - work out tension spots through (12 to 15) massage sessions - grape seed oil - use a lot of oil - kegels increase orgasmic response - women urinate and ejaculate from the same hole - when fingering the clit and orgasm starts, stop moving but keep finger lightly in place - massage and work away any tension spots - under shoulder blades - it helps to have more people involved - sensitive spot in buttocks [communicate with female] - spot inside thigh - lungs right below collar bone - top and bottom of the breast - all round the rib cage - top of the pubic bone [very sensitive but very important] - both sides and top of vagina - spend a lot of time on these spots - female will bruise so she must eat oranges the days after - 1 or 2 sessions a week at the most - the massage gets the blood flowing and making the female ready to orgasm For orgasm: - 2 middle fingers - in and up into G spot - hold pubic bone down with other hand - up and down movement with 2 fingers - may appear rough [it's not] - keep properly oiled - whole body and continuous orgasms - drink afterwardsnondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Wed, 08 May 2013 10:23:10 +0000 prioritieshttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2931,from=rss#post2931https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2931,from=rss#post2931Women can smell STD infection in men, reveals new science A few things i didn't know (were important) 25 years ago and i wish someone had told ME... - get rid of body hair. It's not natural. To consider what's NATURAL, you must accept that mankind only goes back maybe 100,000 years. To understand this you must understand about the Anunnaki. We are a hybrid species that makes no sense, genetically speaking. Therefore there's no point in sticking to what cosmetics we just happen to be stuck with at the end of genetic engineering by an inhuman species. Your hair, including pubic and facial hair, isn't anything to be dogmatic about. Beards and other hair aren't natural. It's also hygienic to be clean of hair and that IS attractive to the opposite sex, being clean. I'm not saying it's bad to have a beard; it is just pushing it by growing a long one and not trimming it. - make sure you recently washed if you have sex. If you need to, take a quick shower before you get intimate. If necessary, just clean your genitals. Even if YOU don't care about such things, most people do. And even if your partner won't in a moment of passion, they'll start to when the hormones have settled. - Charles Darwin's research shows that HEALTH is attractive. Therefore, avoid being sick, avoid bad health, and avoid being weak. That way you will be acceptable to the most attractive possible people.nondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Sat, 06 Apr 2013 00:29:37 +0000 gendershttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2930,from=rss#post2930https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2930,from=rss#post2930The following point is as much about politics, humanity, and psychology as it is about genders from a scientific point of view. I had to make a choice where to put it; i estimate under SEX is the most appropriate. Language and the differences between the sexes We live in cultures in which the differences between the sexes are systematically ignored and downplayed. And yet, as Charles Darwin argues in his The Descent of Man, mankind is clearly one of the species in which male and female are very different from one another (completely unlike a wildebeast or crocodile; crocs can't even tell each other apart until their responses to mating signals are interchanged). Part of this has resulted in a completely screwed up sexuality. 20 to 25% of Western men are impotent and those who have a healthier libido are 90% sexually starved. It is sad, insane, and unhealthy. It is utterly inhuman. Men subconsciously embrace declining libido because society doesn't offer them a way to express it anyway. Men struggle with their libido in modern society. It only gives aggravation and frustration, not pleasure or fulfilment. Mankind's views of how men and women can and should interact are not based on any tradition, sense, or science. It is shere and utter madness. It's about being completely lost as a culture and as a species. The Japanese used to have 2 different writing systems for men and women. Now they are intermixed and it's what's we know as Japanese today. In Marion Zimmer Bradley's Firebrand she portrays an Amazonian culture of women who allow men into their society during 2 months of the year. These are interesting expressions of humanity to ponder. Women are centered in the right hemisphere, men in the left hemisphere of mankind's awesome brain. It is who we are. It is WHAT we are. Women are the part of humanity that has NOT specialized the brain to become what brings forth 'human culture'; women are mankind's roots to their 'animal side'. Women naturally tend to clan-like associations. Their nature makes them more authoritarian, among other things. They are more instinctive. Ironically, the supposed evils in mankind's history are commonly thought to come from the limitations of the male brain and attitude. This is, however, clearly an insane approach to a complicated issue since mankind is nothing without BOTH the female and male aspects. The fact is, however, that women do quite well without men and men do quite well without women, most of the time. HOW and WHEN they share their unique approach to life says everything about the expression of humanity in the case of individuals. Men and women could even speak different languages. It might even promote a more human culture. Since women need to speak 4000 words a day and men only 700, if they couldn't really speak much AT ALL, society would be FORCED to offer women contact with other women. The situation in Western societies now promotes alienation and seclusion,, with unnatural, unhealthy, and unhappy tiny family units. Male and female brains work very differently. They really don't have much business reading each other's books anyway. A man can read a book and change his life; a women needs LIFE to change; they change through experience. They both have utterly different approaches to dealing with words. The culture in which they use the same words just gives the false impression that there's common ground here. There's this Japanese man who went to Morocco, found himself a Moroccan wife, and has lived there happily these past 20 years. He and his wife can only communicate with difficulty. Yet he is happy and at peace as he was unable to be in his own native Japan. Why? How? Understanding of what fulfills men and women makes it clear that talking between men and women is not part of the basic communication that's going on. In many cultures men and women basically live separately all day long. Only at night do men and women come together. As Charles Darwin's research clearly shows, we are a communal species. The tiny family unit of Western society is unnatural. It promotes inhuman relationships and an inhuman society. Ironically, all of the inhuman, inefficient, and misguiding communications between people are in part due to TALKING... Attitudes, relationships, mutual demands and dependancies are as much part of communication as talking is. However, no amount of talking will make up for a lack of the other aspects of society that are lacking through inhuman connections. Basically, the Western (inhuman) madness stems from trying to achieve equal RIGHTS by encouraging equal LIVES. The right for a WOMAN to be A WOMAN is important but it's not achieved by offering her all of the rights that MEN have to BE MEN. Equal opportunity differs from gender to gender. They have different ways of expressing themselves, of experiencing sexuality, of finding peace and happiness; to pretend that by homogenizing the genders they'll somehow find a place where both will find fulfillment is just insane. What both will get is frustration. It's not just about sex; it's about peace of mind, it's about happiness, and it's just about humanity. Western culture, now being exported to more natural societies all over the world [!], promotes frustration and unhappiness. Everything from sexuality, to relationships, to language itself will need to be reevaluated in order to establish a society that is supportive of happiness, humanity, and psychological health.nondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Sat, 06 Apr 2013 00:27:15 +0000 pheromoneshttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2888,from=rss#post2888https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p2888,from=rss#post2888According to Atom Bergstrom a woman's olfactory organ's sensibility is increased 1000-fold during ovulation. This is the time of the month when her body is focused on finding good DNA.nondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:27:28 +0000 finding [& keeping] a (suitable) matehttps://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p1507,from=rss#post1507https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/p1507,from=rss#post1507Kissing Magic Our (Western) culture is insane and inhuman. We grow up getting conditioned to insane and inhuman attitudes. It results in us not being able to trust our own instincts and feelings anymore. There comes a point where we would do well to reassess our gut reactions and desires, including as far as suitable partners/mates are concerned. This is all particularly sensitive to young people. They figure they'll just play it by ear and they haven't yet EXPERIENCED firsthand that that tends to work out TERRIBLY. (Therefore, even if you happen to be one of the lucky ones, you're surrounded by sexually frustrated friends and family.) After some life experience the data starts making sense: 66% divorce rates, averages of people having sex twice a week IF THEY'RE LUCKY, etc. etc. etc. There's one group of young people who are particularly susceptible to being complacent and just going with the flow: young women; they naturally tend to get loads of attention and all the sex they might wish. Though they also suffer from bad relationships, they get by on many points just fine. They have no great desire to rock the boat. Then, after youth is gone, their lives are pure disappointment, i.e. 10 to 20 years of Bacchanal pleause followed by 50 years of disaster... For young men and more mature people, modern Western mores turn out terribly. They learn that sex drive never goes away but the sex does! It may come back for limited periods but then it's followed by much longer periods of infrequent, unsatisfying or no sex. We all tend to blame ourselves when the problem lies in Western assumptions, values, and conditioning. You will not live a satisfying, happy or humane life when you just go with the flow and stick to Western ideals and habits, including those pertaining to sexuality. I've considered these matters in some detail in the following articles i've written on such things: - The Female Moral Vacuum - The 20 Year Female Window of Opportunity 5 Things All Men Should Know About Women!! Dating Tips, Relationship Advice, MeerKat Morning Show! - We vs me - invitational language - sharing feelings - defining the "public" in PDA [public display of affection] - random acts of romancenondisclosed_email@example.com (TheLivingShadow)Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:58:31 +0000