Runboard.com
You're welcome.
Community logo

TEOMCROTE = TEOTWAWKI on steroids! The End Of Mankind's Current Reign Over The Earth takes into account that our ancestors were neither suicidal, stupid, nor our genetic inferiors but still wound up getting wiped off the Earth. Whereas CSER [cser.org: Centre for Study of Existential Risk] tries to PREVENT this dispensation from coming to an end, TEOMCROTE works from the eventuality/possibility/probability that the end our age takes place and what to do then

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Reptilian Morality and Law


The hive-mind oriented elite overlords of mankind are not without culture, their own set of morals, nor spirituality; and each sophisticated, ancient, and taken very seriously by those who live by the hive-mind. To understand authoritarian-based spirituality and culture the last thing we can afford is to consider it with a biased and superior 'human' attitude. If the mammalian brain is capable of empathy that the reptilian brain lacks, does that make the reptilian brain any less intelligent? Does it make the reptilian brain any less conscious or part of a 'god'-consciousness? Are we humans to assume that Reptilians are inferior and should bow down to human superiority? We will not understand other forms of intelligence by such hubris.

Luckily, we don't only have our ability to think to help us understand how authoritarians see things; they themselves are compelled by their very own culture to explain it to us.

They actually are doing so constantly, though most people aren't aware of it. As long as we don't make the mistake of confusing their culture with human culture, the pieces of the human-reptilian puzzle can fall into place and start making sense to even a human mind, even though a human cannot empathize with their hive mindset.

  
Words are one of the clues to understanding our reptilian-minded neighbors. Taking words very literally is always a good idea to get clarity. In understanding something completely alien to your human heart, falling back on the mind and on the simple logic and facts about words is a good technique.
Considering how Reptilian and human morality differ, then, we should look at the word "moral"; it comes from the Latin root "mores" which doesn't mean "law " but rather translates into "habits", "tradition", or according to ancient principles: the Law of the Land. In order to understand the culture, morals, and laws of an alien intelligence, it's good to first understand the roots of your own precepts and "the Law of the Land" is a good place to start because it's the basis for most laws that we know today that have been passed down through the millennia.

 
Ancient times and ancient laws, of course, had everything to do with the Reptilian royal overlords who passed decreed those laws. All royal families are descended from forebears with (purer) Reptilian blood, something most royal families readily and with pride acknowledge according to ancient so-called myths. Many ancient stories tell of how a dynasty was first founded with the coupling of man and 'god', or man and 'dragon', etc etc. These were the 'rightful' heirs to power and passed their authoritarian hive-minded culture on to the people that they ruled over. "By royal decree" were many 'laws' passed. But were they "laws" in any literal sense? Are we talking "rules", "morals", or true "laws"? That is a very important question to answer to be able to understand what lies at the foundation, not only of our cultures' laws but also of the value we attribute to words like "moral", "morals", or "morality". It's also vital to understanding the difference between what might be called a human culture and one that is based on the hive mindset, i.e. inherently inhuman.


 
The research of Jordan Maxwell is essential reading when covering such ground. He is the man who stood model to the main character in the Da Vinci Code, a master in understanding symbolism and knowledge that's all around us but hidden in plain sight. He explains that there were two basic tenants to establishing law: Maritime or Admiralty Law and The Law of the Land. Most law/rules are based on the principle of Maritime Law and the clues to what that is and how it works are all around us. We can see it in the institutions we deal with, in the words we use, and in the concepts we think by.
 
Research into the Reptilian agenda taught us long ago that we were engineered as slaves. Now, do slaves have rights, do they own things? Slave masters own whatever their slaves control. So what are the laws for if slaves have no rights nor property? The laws are not for the slaves, they're for their masters. Admiralty Law is what the masters abide by.
The simple wording of Admiralty Law makes clear what's going on. Every slave on this planet is born into captivity, property of some unnamed master. The "birth" of the slave is about property being increased. The mother slave gives birth, as a ship comes in to berth. Your birth certificate, something that must be done swiftly and by law, is about setting to paper who the newborn is owned by. In general that would be whoever owns the country the child's born in.

  
We slaves are all governed by relationSHIPs of all kinds; our parents sign us off to the government at birth /BERTH and our persons are bartered off as mortgages to banks as commodities. (The word "government" comes from 2 words, together meaning to steer/pilot the mind.) We have a name, but that name capitalized is our commodity designation and it's owned by a bank . You are owned by a bank, mortgaged off by your slave master, the ruler of the country you were born in [acknowledged and participated by your parents who in their complacency and ignorance signed you over].
It is demanded that you, as property of your king or queen, pay dues to your master: you pay taxes and you abide by the rules they set for those living in their dominion. You could buy your freedom or bargain for it but your ignorant acquiescence, according to Reptilian morals, is enough grounds to guaranty your life and death as a slave. You and your kind were engineered to serve them and until you prove yourself at least equal to the task of accepting and understanding that you are governed by SOMEONE [if not yourself, then by someone else], in their book you're simply an asset, a(n expendable) piece of biological equipment or cattle.

 
continue to part 2

---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
4/24/2011, 7:09 am Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
part 2


There's the Law of the Sea [Admiralty Law] that rules over you as slave property and there are more local rules in place that the slave masters use to rule over their property. This is determined, in practice, by whatever suits them, whatever works. The so-called Law of the Land is a package of rules and regulations that have survived unchallenged and have been upgraded to the status of "law". A slave master can apply any such law, no matter how injust, by the simple fact that the slaves haven't successfully rebelled against it [obviously because they're completely ignorant of what's going on to begin with]. This is where the word "mores"/"morals" comes in: "mores" is just a set of rules and regulations. When you're being immoral, therefore, in the literal sense you're simply not living by the set rules and regulations. It's something completely different than being unprincipled or "illegal", which has to do with "law" or "leges" [Latin]. Immorality only has to do with lawlessness in the Law of the Land (Reptilian) way of looking at things. But because, according to the hive mind, rules that aren't challenged become law, immoral action is more than just 'inappropriate', 'uncivilized', or 'untoward'. They then become a legitimate [they've become "law"/"leges"] ground for a fine, imprisonment, or stoning.

All of this doesn't necessarily apply to the sensibilities of humans at all. We've all assumed this is the way governments must function because mankind has suffered under Maritime Law and the oppressive Law of the Land-based local laws and morality ever since mankind was created (to function as a slave race to our Reptilian overlords). Human sensibilities, based on the human ability to empathize (which the Reptilians lack), only coincide with hive-mind based morality to the degree that humans allow them to. You can buy back the contract that binds you to your slave master and you can disassociate yourself from the country you are bound to by setting up your own. Some groups of people have been working to such ends and, based on my own research , i recommend David Williams' website and to research "Maritime Law" or "Admiralty Law".
 

Authoritarians like the hive-minded Reptilians are opportunists, i.e. inherently 'lawless' and 'unprincipled' in any literal sense (and certainly in any human sense); all authoritarians are. They only adhere to 'laws' in the sense that some rule or regulation is accepted by the hive as "law". There's no connection to other forms of intelligence other than the hive-minded kind, nor is there a responsibility to a 'god consciousness' other than accepted in their spirituality (as the hive accept it). A being that lives by empathy completely confounds them. Why, they wonder, would someone care about anything other than what 'others' [i.e. the hive] care about? Hence, they are opportunists, for if the hive doesn't know or care about something, anything goes.
This means that Reptilians in effect acknowledge no laws at all; they acknowledge RULES. They acknowledge their own MORALS, i.e. rules and regulations that are acknowledged by the hive. All of this means that though they TALK about morality all of the time, they actually don't have principled laws in the most literal sense. Hence, as a species and as individuals they are opportunists.
  
Their religions/spirituality, their culture, and their rules and regulations are founded on ancient tenants and practicality. According to human sensibilities they are immoral; what irony then that they are in fact utterly moral (in the literal sense)! What authoritarians are, in fact, is moral but lawless. They consider US unsophisticated because we don't adhere to morals that go back billions of years, we consider THEM unsophisticated because their morals allow the abuse of intelligent beings like ourselves, ignorant or no. They see themselves as practical, we see them as pirates. Because we defy any regulation that doesn't resonate with the heart, they see us as unruly and lawless, while we experience their rule as oppressive and heartless. We are truly two hearts beating to a different drum.

 
They cannot learn from us, no do they wish to, and we cannot learn from them. We, humans and Reptilians, work by two completely different and uncompromizing paradigms. We cannot reason with each other, nor empathize with each other. If we respect each other, it can only come from a respect based on principle on our part,, respect based on practicality, ritual, and/or fear on their part. You can like a crocodile, respect its character and/or how dangerous it can be, but you can never empathize with its completely opportunistic nature as a human being with a mammalian mindset.
Not all Reptilians are authoritarian and this is only meant to apply to those Reptilians who are. There are human-Reptilian hybrid species, like ourselves, who have a choice which mindset to live by. It must, however, be understood that there can be no hybrid culture. There can never be a culture that embraces both empathic lawfulness and opportunistic morality. There's no grey area between the two. They're two paradigms that point in opposite directions and there's no point whatsoever in trying to reconcile them.
They are the Yin and Yang of intelligent life. There's the respect for the individual as god-spark, and there's the respect for the hive as representative of divine right. It goes back to the right-by-might or right-by-competence principle, the group being the ultimate power to be respected. It's about how high one sets the bar; do you have to take every single intelligent life-form into account? It's human to say "Yes"; the authoritarian says "You will be assimilated". Is the crocodile better than man? The crocodile is, man is. Stay away from the croc pool and we'll all be fine.

If you are human, trapped on a Reptilian-ruled planet/system, you are a Yang that is naturally at odds with the Yin that is authoritarianism. This inevitable strife can only be transcended, it cannot be won. In order to overcome your situation, you must grow beyond human boundaries of mammalian empathic understanding. A conceited "Reptilians are barbarians!" or "They are an inferior species!" will get you nowhere. Yin doesn't conquer Yang or the other way around. Yin and Yang simply are. Transcendence is about seeing and dealing with both simultaneously. "Law" and "morality" have many shades, depending on the paradigm you're working from, but there are no greys.
A human working by authoritarian morals is a slave and a tool of, asset to, a Reptilian master. Grow in knowledge and be free; wallow in ignorance and die as the inferior slave that the authoritarians consider worthy only to be milked to death like the cattle you were bred to be.

---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
4/24/2011, 7:09 am Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 


Add a reply





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top