Runboard.com
You're welcome.
Community logo

TEOMCROTE = TEOTWAWKI on steroids! The End Of Mankind's Current Reign Over The Earth takes into account that our ancestors were neither suicidal, stupid, nor our genetic inferiors but still wound up getting wiped off the Earth. Whereas CSER [cser.org: Centre for Study of Existential Risk] tries to PREVENT this dispensation from coming to an end, TEOMCROTE works from the eventuality/possibility/probability that the end our age takes place and what to do then

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Flat Earth


Image
Image
NASA Insider Exposes the Flat Earth!
The main argument brought forward by the above painter is that all supposed pictures of the Earth are faked and that this is because the Earth looks nothing like that in reality. However, though the Earth being very different is one possible reason for NASA faking pictures, it could also be that NASA really can't take any pictures for any other of other reasons, like because they never actually accomplished getting anything into space (because of a protective shield surrounding the Earth, as many insiders suggest who speak of alien involvement of Earth as prison planet).

other posts on Flat Earth theory

Last edited by TheLivingShadow, 4/29/2015, 10:05 am


---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
4/12/2015, 9:00 am Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
sources


prioritized, with which i find most valuable listed first
- the International Flat Earth Research Society
- Eric Dubay on YouTube
- Mark Sargent: Flat Earth Clues

Last edited by TheLivingShadow, 4/21/2015, 7:49 am


---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
4/17/2015, 8:46 am Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
what i understand of it so far


All large celestial bodies are hollow. The Hollow Earth was supposed to have an outer shell of some 800km thick.

The Sumerian tablets translated by Zecharia Sitchin tell us there was a larger planet (than Earth) in between Mars and Jupiter. It was hit by one of Nibiru's moons and destroyed but a part of it became our Earth. The rest became the asteroid belt.

A segment of Tiamat might have remained in tact and according to basic hollow planet physics would:
- be much thicker than 800 km
- be less curved than a global Earth is presumed to be
- have oceans and land on both sides
- have hollows within itself, as well (since any mass exceeding 150km has a hollow center)

Such attributes would explain the fact that the Flat Earth is not exactly flat, though much flatter than the global model demands. In effect, why would a piece of a planet the size of a planet like Mars or Earth (is presumed to be) not contain an atmosphere and support life? Just because it's not spherical, it's still a lump of dirt floating around in space.

I've heard flat earthers suppose many things about a Flat Earth that suggest ignorance about such things as hollow planets. They therefore go on to suppose the Earth is some artificial construct, even divinely constructed by some 'God' figure.
In the end, what does it really matter? Flattish or spherical, similar to other planets or no, the only thing that truly matters is the possible frequent destruction on this (piece of a) planet by the passing of Nibiru or whatever else comes our way and effects us.

Though 'flat earthers' suggest all things celestial are also a lie,, including Sun, Moon, and stars,, this has as yet not been argued to my satisfaction.
I am yet again reminded of details of Sitchin's translations being ignored; just like people talking genetic engineering by Anunnaki/ENKI ignore the fact that homo erectus was discovered (by ENKI) to be already a product of genetic engineering, flat earthers appear to ignore Sitchin's talk about Tiamat and how Earth came out of it's destruction.
If however, one sticks to this archaeological evidence, there is no need to start questioning 'God' and the heavens in order to accept that the Earth might be flattish.

Why would TPTB deceive us so? If all celestial bodies are perfectly spherical except for us, that calls out for explanations they are not willing for us to know about. For if the Tiamat story is true, then the Anunnaki and Nibiru story is, as well. And that would mean that destruction is imminent. One follows from the other. Since we cannot be allowed to know about the culling that's about to take place, we cannot know about the true nature of the Earth.

Last edited by TheLivingShadow, 4/29/2015, 10:13 am


---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
4/17/2015, 9:08 am Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 
TheLivingShadow Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Location: Morocco
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
thinking out loud...


What if Tiamat was destroyed and not only the Earth is what's left of it but so is the Earth's Sun?
All large spherical bodies are not only hollow but also have inner suns; if Tiamat was destroyed, might not the gravitational pull of what was left of it (i.e. Earth) have formed a kind of binary projectile? Could this be why the Moon is so large for a celestial body the size of Earth, since it was really one of the moons of Tiamat before the destruction thereof?

If so and Tiamat's inner sun now orbits Earth (or if they're spinning around each other in some binary fashion), as does it's moon, our Sun illuminates what's left of Tiamat's hollow center at night.
If our Sun is only our own, what about the rest of the solar system? Does it not even exist as the flat earthers suggest or is there nothing at the center of it?

Are we the only 'planet' with sunlight and is the heating up of the other planets solely due to the coming of Nemesis/Nibiru?

Did this cause the extinction of the dinosaurs?, i.e. did this happen 65,000,000 years ago?

Did a Pangea exist, only it was one of the continents that survived Tiamat's demise only to split into pieces afterwards? (After all, the continents of Earth all fit together.)
That would mean the Earth is either seriously shifting or expanding. Is it finished doing so? Will the Earth some day be destroyed because only the spherical form is viable long-term?

Did alien technology save this one section of Tiamat though they could not prevent the destruction of the planet itself? Is alien technology allowing life on the Earth to this very day? Do aliens treat us like !@#$ because we owe our very existence to them?

Was the destruction of Tiamat intentional or coincidental? Celestial bodies roaming through space are supposed to become negatively charged and avoid other celestial objects because 2 negatives repel each other. The destruction of Tiamat could also have been an act of war. Certainly certain accounts, like that of David Wilcox, suggests terrible battles have raged in our solar system.

Alien technology could have made the surviving piece of Tiamat perfectly round, or perhaps Earth is anything but round. It could be square or any irregular shape.
Is the ice wall surrounding the seas [assumably frozen by the cold of space] actually the shape of 'Antarctica', i.e. is the shape of Earth the same as Antarctica but inverted? I mean, when we reach the shores of Antarctica, are we really reaching the edge? And that edge is irregular just like the shape of Antarctica according to NASA?

Last edited by TheLivingShadow, 4/21/2015, 10:04 am


---
READ THIS AND SAVE YOUR OWN LIFE
4/17/2015, 12:04 pm Link to this post Send Email to TheLivingShadow   Send PM to TheLivingShadow Blog
 


Add a reply





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top